Someone retypes it every day.
The same information moves between tools, one field at a time, every single day.
Workflow design and automation.
Easily map how work moves through your team. Then the Clean Plan shows what's broken, what it costs, and what to fix.
See the whole process before you start: a finished plan, live build and final handoff.
Four things go wrong in every business that grew without a plan. Your map takes about ten minutes; the Clean Plan shows where all four are hiding in it.
Every manual workflow hides the same four flags: something repeated by hand, waiting on someone, held together by a workaround, or failing silently.
The same information moves between tools, one field at a time, every single day.
An approval, a callback, a person everyone depends on. The queue is invisible until it's late.
A forwarding rule, a shared doc, an unofficial system nobody signed off on but everyone relies on.
Nothing throws an error. No alert fires. The task falls off, and the day carries on.
Explain the process as you would to a new hire, shortcuts included. I'll map the first draft for you automatically.
how would you explain it to a new hire? shortcuts and workarounds included
Answer a few questions instead. Your map grows with every answer.
Here's how it works:
When an order lands in the inbox, who picks it up first?
that's enough, I'll finish the map myself
Nothing yet. Answer the first question.
Ten sections covering what's wrong, what to fix, what it costs and what happens next.
You drew six steps and every one carries a flag, but the pattern is simple: the order arrives clean, then people move it by hand between a spreadsheet, an inbox, and QuickBooks.
Every step with an owner on it and a flag where it needs one: who holds the work today, and where it sits waiting.
Explore the complete public plan, including two fixes I recommended skipping. Read it →
CreditedIf you decide I'm the right person to build your workflow automation, the cost of the Clean Plan is credited toward the full build.
The plan compares the build cost with the time and money it gives back. If the numbers don't clear one year, or you think I've missed the mark, I'll refund the $997. You keep the plan either way.
You get a status page while I build, and another one when I'm done. Here is what each one is for.
See what shipped, what's running and what comes next, without status meetings.
Every access request and decision appears in one dated list, never buried in email.
The accounts and code are in your name. My access is removed at handoff.
You get a plain-language guide to running, changing and troubleshooting it, plus 30 days of me watching it run.
Both are real pages on a real engagement: a build in progress → a finished handoff →
See a real plan, an active build and the final handoff.
A free audit usually qualifies you for a pitch. Here, the work itself is the product: your map, your plan and a live view of the build. No account, password or call required.
That's the whole reason the mapper exists. Boxes and arrows, in your own words. If you can explain it to a new hire, you can draw it. And if you get stuck, there's a button that interviews you instead: it asks one plain question at a time, and your map fills in as you answer.
Only me. Your map lives on a private, unlisted link: no account, no directory, nothing searchable, and there's nobody else here to see it. Leave out passwords and customer records, the map only needs the steps and who does them.
No, and a real share of people don't. Some take the plan and do it in-house. Some find out the fix is a $30 tool they already had a licence for. Both are good outcomes.
It's normal, and it's usually exactly where the workarounds and the silent failures live. The gaps between tools are the interesting part.
Plan in five business days. Most first builds ship in two to four weeks, and the first one is chosen because it pays back fastest.
You do. Accounts in your name, code in your repo, a written runbook, and a break-glass doc for when something upstream changes. Nothing is hostage to me still being around.
That's your call, and I'll scope it either way. Most owners want the retyping and the chasing gone so their people can spend the day on work that brings money in, which is usually where the growth is anyway. If you'd rather automate a role away entirely, a fair amount of that is genuinely possible now, and I'll tell you honestly how far it goes before you spend anything. Either way, the plan names who owns every step afterwards, so nobody finds out by surprise.
Most owners haven't. The problem usually isn't the people or the tools, it's that nobody has drawn how the work actually moves.
Start there. In ten minutes, you'll have a map worth keeping whether we work together or not.